Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: "John Thingstad" <john.thingstad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:54:58 +0100
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:28:58 +0100, pfisk <peter.fisk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have looked at RDNZL and it is totally useless for what I wish to
do, which is running graphic intensive applications in a browser or on
the desktop.
My implementation doesn't generate CLR code - it generates a custom
bytecode which runs in an interpreter.
Well I would write the interface in C# and use RDNZL to interface to it.
That way I get the advantage of the C# express interface designer.
I take it this is not acceptable to you?
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: pfisk
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- References:
- Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: pfisk
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: dixkey
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: pfisk
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: jvdvyah
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: pfisk
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- From: pfisk
- Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- Prev by Date: Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- Next by Date: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Previous by thread: Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- Next by thread: Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|