Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: George Neuner <gneuner2/@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:28:35 -0500
On 31 Jan 2007 09:14:59 -0800, "Tim Bradshaw" <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As an aside: is the Intel quad core processor actually quad core? The
only one I'm aware of is two dual-core processors strapped onto one
package.
--tim
You're correct. The real quad core chip is due late this year.
George
--
for email reply remove "/" from address
.
- References:
- Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: Paul Wallich
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Prev by Date: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Next by Date: Re: All Your GUIs Are Belong to Us (Die, McCLIM! Die!!)
- Previous by thread: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Next by thread: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|