Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?

From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:30:52 +0000

On 2007-01-31 20:07:48 +0000, "John Thingstad" <john.thingstad@xxxxxxxxx> said:

http://www.intel.com/quad-core/index.htm?iid=homepage_quad-core

That's the one I thought: two dual-core dies in one package. It's basically a denser way of packaging a pair of dual-core CPUs: in particular I don't think they share much cache.

--tim

.

References:
- Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: George Neuner
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: Marcus Breiing
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: John Thingstad
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: Paul Wallich
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: John Thingstad
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
  - From: John Thingstad

Prev by Date: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
Next by Date: Defmacro Signature
Previous by thread: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
Next by thread: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread