Re: Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- From: "Tim Bradshaw" <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2007 04:48:32 -0800
On Feb 27, 11:27 am, André Thieme
Here you have passed the literal list (LAMBDA (X) (+ 3 X)) as a
function, because you quoted that form: Instead you need to pass a
function.
What does it mean?
Instead of passing a function he should have passed a... function?
Sorry! What I meant to say was: he passed a (literal) list as an
argument to a function which was expecting that argument to be a
function.
It was early in the morning, and the cat wrote it anyway.
--tim
.
- References:
- Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- From: S. Robert James
- Re: Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- From: André Thieme
- Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- Prev by Date: Optimizing sort-algorithm
- Next by Date: Re: Optimizing sort-algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp Syntax - functions versus data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
