Re: SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- From: Frank Buss <fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:15:27 +0100
Alex Mizrahi wrote:
Windows NT certified as fully POSIX (Portable Operating System
Interface)-compliant.
But did you read the article, which was cited on wikipedia?
http://www.gcn.com/print/14_23/31557-1.html
Sounds like lots of problems, if you want to port a Unix application. And
for most Windows versions, like XP, you'll need the 217 MB "Windows
Services for UNIX" installation (but looks like you can download it for
free).
--
Frank Buss, fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
.
- References:
- SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- From: quasistellarlight
- Re: SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
- Re: SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- Prev by Date: Re: SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- Next by Date: Using both cores on Intel Mac with SBCL
- Previous by thread: Re: SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- Next by thread: Re: SBCL on win32 without Cygwin?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|