Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Alain Picard <Alain.Picard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:17:42 +1100
Brian Adkins <lojicdotcomNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Zach Beane wrote:[SNIP]
There is no self/this.
Sure there is, it just doesn't have to be named self or this. Consider
the following contrived example:
I wasn't commenting on the pros/cons of either approach just trying to
determine if I misunderstood something.
You did. the bit you misunderstood is
"There is no self/this."
Now you have had two experienced lispers say this, so instead
of retorting once more with an example that shows we're wrong,
try to kick you thinking into a different plane, to see if you
can understand what it is we're saying, and why we're saying it.
You might discover something useful.
I don't mean to be snipy or obnoxious here --- this is a common
"failure to learn" symptom. I'm honestly encouraging you to
look at this again from a fresh perspective.
--ap
.
- References:
- Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Brian Adkins
- Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Dan Bensen
- Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Brian Adkins
- Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Zach Beane
- Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Brian Adkins
- Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Zach Beane
- Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- From: Brian Adkins
- Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- Prev by Date: Flavors to Lisp convertor
- Next by Date: Re: learning Common Lisp ;; i came back Full-Circle
- Previous by thread: Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- Next by thread: Re: Porting Ruby snippet to Lisp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
