Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Mike Ajemian <mike_ajemian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:03:29 GMT
Tim Bradshaw wrote:
On 2007-03-24 23:25:48 +0000, Mike Ajemian <mike_ajemian@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Like it or not, it's still a valid member of the set of all possibilities.
Breaking the Geheimschreiber by exhaustively enumerating all chi & psi streams would have been "a valid member of the set of all possibilities". Luckily we had smarter people.
Yawn. You must be a riot at parties.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: lisp revised standard
- References:
- lisp revised standard
- From: amolaggarwal@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: kentilton
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: amolaggarwal@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: kentilton
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Mike Ajemian
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Mike Ajemian
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Mike Ajemian
- Re: lisp revised standard
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- lisp revised standard
- Prev by Date: Re: learning Common Lisp ;; i came back Full-Circle (OT)
- Next by Date: Re: lisp revised standard
- Previous by thread: Re: lisp revised standard
- Next by thread: Re: lisp revised standard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|