Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:12:43 +0200
On 30 Mar 2007 08:06:18 -0700, "Zach" <netrek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This page covers the Second Edition of CLTL but I have the First
Edition doh :)
Sorry, I didn't look closely enough at your original posting. What
Zach Beane said - throw CLtL1 away, read through PCL and PAIP, then
maybe buy and read CLtL2. OK, enough abbreviations for today.
--
Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.
Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Vassil Nikolov
- Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- References:
- Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Zach
- Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Edi Weitz
- Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Zach
- Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Prev by Date: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Next by Date: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Previous by thread: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Next by thread: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|