Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Dan Bensen <randomgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:22:18 -0500
Zach wrote:
I would like to begin learning LISP soon.As Edi mentioned, it's not called "LISP" anymore. It's "Lisp".
I have the book, "Common LISP: The Language"Don't use that version, it's missing a lot of changes.
by Guy L. Steele, Jr., printed in 1984
There's a 2nd edition from 1990 here:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/cltl2.html
You can download it from links at the bottom of the page.
I'm wondering if this is a good book for learning LISP.It's a reference, not a tutorial. The book Edi mentioned
is a popular tutorial. CLtL2 is a good reference, though.
Is the content very much in agreement with the ANSIIt's not as authoritative as the hyperspec, but it's pretty
LISP standard?
close, and you can download it in several formats.
--
Dan
www.prairienet.org/~dsb/
.
- References:
- Common Lisp book still apropos?
- From: Zach
- Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Prev by Date: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Next by Date: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Previous by thread: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Next by thread: Re: Common Lisp book still apropos?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|