What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: fireblade <slobodan.blazeski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2007 07:14:28 -0700
I just finished reading Anti Patterns Refactoring Software
Architectures,and it hint me that i'm regularly singing gospels to
lisp being a universal hummer for every kind of problem. Once in a
while somebody ask's what is lisp bad for? I basically have only two
ideas:
1.Talking with c++ (Possible but not recommended, due to c++
idiosyncrasy )
2. Erlang/Termite like processes (i wonder how many processes could
scieener support?)
What are the other domains where lisp doesn't fit in?
bobi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Pierre THIERRY
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Alan Manuel K. Gloria
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Andrew Reilly
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Chris Russell
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Dan Bensen
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Prev by Date: splicing with subst
- Next by Date: checking implementation defined and implementation dependent behaviour
- Previous by thread: splicing with subst
- Next by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|