Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: "Malcolm McLean" <regniztar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:31:30 +0100
"fireblade" <slobodan.blazeski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1177683268.277941.10880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I just finished reading Anti Patterns Refactoring SoftwareI suspect, as a new Lisper, that Lisp is the language of choice when you don't know the degree of recursion in your data structures, but a poor competitor when you do. If you know the full structure in advance, then an array and indirection-type language will be simpler and faster.
Architectures,and it hint me that i'm regularly singing gospels to
lisp being a universal hummer for every kind of problem. Once in a
while somebody ask's what is lisp bad for? I basically have only two
ideas:
1.Talking with c++ (Possible but not recommended, due to c++
idiosyncrasy )
2. Erlang/Termite like processes (i wonder how many processes could
scieener support?)
What are the other domains where lisp doesn't fit in?
--
Free games and programming goodies.
http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Don Geddis
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- References:
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: fireblade
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Prev by Date: Re: knowledge base in FOL
- Next by Date: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Previous by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Next by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|