Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Don Geddis <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:10:10 -0700
"Malcolm McLean" <regniztar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Sat, 28 Apr 2007:
I suspect, as a new Lisper, that Lisp is the language of choice when you
don't know the degree of recursion in your data structures, but a poor
competitor when you do.
Your suspicion is incorrect, and due purely to your lack of experience.
If you know the full structure in advance, then an array and
indirection-type language will be simpler and faster.
You're also confused that Lisp only supports recursion. In fact the most
popular dialect, Common Lisp, is explicitly a multi-paradigm language. EVEN
IF array access is a "simpler and faster" implementation for some algorithm,
you can program directly in that style in any standard Common Lisp. It's all
built in already.
-- Don
_______________________________________________________________________________
Don Geddis http://don.geddis.org/ don@xxxxxxxxxx
If I ever get real rich, I hope I'm not real mean to poor people, like I am
now. -- Deep Thoughts, by Jack Handey
.
- References:
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: fireblade
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple question
- Next by Date: Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- Previous by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Next by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Index(es):