Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: GP lisper <spambait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:01:17 -0700
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:11:12 -0400, <gneuner2/@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:16:32 +0200, Pascal Bourguignon
<pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dan Bensen <randomgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
fireblade wrote:
What are ... domains where lisp doesn't fit in?
Drivers: close to the metal.
If lisp worked perfectly well as system programming language on the
lisp machines, what does that say on the ability of lisp for writting
drivers?
It says that the Lisp machines had special hardware and kernel support
to make it work.
*shrug*
unless you are going to claim that Intel has not tailored it's current
generation processors to mate to their assembly language.
--
There are no average Common Lisp programmers
Reply-To: email is ignored.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: fireblade
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Dan Bensen
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: George Neuner
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Prev by Date: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Next by Date: tracing a function without knowing its name
- Previous by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Next by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
