Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: szergling <senatorZergling@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Apr 2007 18:52:06 -0700
For an interesting talk by Gerald Sussman on the ambiguity of
'standard mathematical notation', there is an amusing video from
Danfest2004 (http://www.cs.indiana.edu/dfried_celebration.html)
about calculus and mechanics, among other things. It was here
that I realised that Scheme has implicit currying when defining
functions -- (define ((sum x) y) ...)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2726904509434151616&hl=en
(is case anyone missed it)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- References:
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Andy Freeman
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Andy Freeman
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Andy Freeman
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- From: Kent M Pitman
- Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- Prev by Date: Re: pattern-matching in LISP?
- Next by Date: Re: tracing a function without knowing its name
- Previous by thread: Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- Next by thread: Re: Any macro for inserting math "normally"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
