Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere.man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:14:28 -0700, fireblade a écrit:
1.Talking with c++ (Possible but not recommended, due to c++
idiosyncrasy )
As I'm interested myself in interfacing Common Lisp and C++, what do you
see as the problem?
C++ uses the C/Fortran calling convention, so existing FFI to it are
usable. You need name mangling, of course, but nothing in C++ idioms
should prevent anything, AFAICT.
Curiously,
Pierre
--
nowhere.man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
.
- References:
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- From: fireblade
- What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Prev by Date: Re: pattern-matching in LISP?
- Next by Date: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Previous by thread: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Next by thread: checking implementation defined and implementation dependent behaviour
- Index(es):