Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 23:34:11 +0100
Joe Marshall wrote:
Joe Marshall wrote:
If the syntax is a problem, why haven't any alternative syntaxes taken
over for s-expressions?
I ask why alternative lisp syntaxes never took off,
You asked why "alternative syntaxes never took off". Nothing Lisp specific
so I cited several non-Lisp examples.
If you want a Lisp specific example then I'd say why did closures not take
off in BASIC? I think the answer is that BASIC programmers who wanted
something more learned a better tool...
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The F#.NET Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?usenet
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Andy Freeman
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- References:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Prev by Date: Re: What are the domains that lisp doesn't fit int?
- Next by Date: Re: Clarification of Lisp features for a newbie
- Previous by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|