Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility

On May 7, 3:34 pm, Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Joe Marshall wrote:
Joe Marshall wrote:
If the syntax is a problem, why haven't any alternative syntaxes taken
over for s-expressions?

I ask why alternative lisp syntaxes never took off,

You asked why "alternative syntaxes never took off". Nothing Lisp specific
so I cited several non-Lisp examples.

Huh? This thread is called ``How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The
Language's Utility Options''. I embedded a paragraph from Xah which
starts ``There is a common complain by programers about lisp's
notation, of nested parenthesis, being unnatural or difficult to
read.'' I then mentioned M-expressions (the original Lisp syntax),
CGOL (an alternative Lisp syntax), Dylan (a language with a strong
lisp heritage that abandoned the s-expression syntax), and Curl (a
language with a strong lisp heritage that replaced parens by curly
braces). Most people know I'm a lisp hacker, too.

What on earth did you think I was talking about?!

If you want a Lisp specific example then I'd say why did closures not take
off in BASIC? I think the answer is that BASIC programmers who wanted
something more learned a better tool...

Am I missing something here? What does BASIC have to do with Lisp?

What are you smoking, dude?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cons cell archaic!?
    ... How would the implementation of a Lisp without a using cons look like? ... the irregularity in its often cited regular syntax. ... Lisp at core is based on functional programing on lists. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Parsing s-expression trees
    ... expressions --> lisp. ... the irregularity in its often cited regular syntax. ... programers can pretty much tell what piece of source code ... Lisp relies on a regular nested syntax. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Xah on Lisp
    ... Lisp relies on a regular nested syntax. ... Whether the syntax "irregularities" due to the five mentioned characters ... You want me to define the power of a computer language? ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Why dont people like lisp?
    ... writing the domain language as an S-exp ... different document types each with its own rudimentary syntax. ... My program had an embedded Lisp interpreter and worked by ... S-expressions in memory, and then eval'd them with the Lisp ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Why dont people like lisp?
    ... writing the domain language as an S-exp ... different document types each with its own rudimentary syntax. ... My program had an embedded Lisp interpreter and worked by ... S-expressions in memory, and then eval'd them with the Lisp ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)