Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 02:01:01 +0100
Joe Marshall wrote:
What on earth did you think I was talking about?!
Syntax popularity.
What does BASIC have to do with Lisp?
It also sucks?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The F#.NET Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/fsharp_journal/?usenet
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Bob Felts
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- References:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Prev by Date: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by Date: Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- Previous by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Index(es):
