Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Ken Tilton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 01:19:04 -0400
Jon Harrop wrote:
Joe Marshall wrote:....
What does BASIC have to do with Lisp?
It also sucks?
Well, so much for the marketing push into the fertile land of Lisp users. Don't feel bad, I could not even sell these yobbos on a /Lisp/ library. And don't forget how warmly they embraced Dylan.
I understand the concept (Lisp is close enough that you might pull people over) but that also means it is a great language you are trying to drag them from, so... yer gonna need a bigger tractor.
You might try looking in the other direction for subscribers, people using something useless and horrible and utterly unlike F#.
hth,kxo
--
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
"Algebra is the metaphysics of arithmetic." - John Ray
"As long as algebra is taught in school,
there will be prayer in school." - Cokie Roberts
"Stand firm in your refusal to remain conscious during algebra."
- Fran Lebowitz
"I'm an algebra liar. I figure two good lies make a positive."
- Tim Allen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: JeremiaThomas
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- References:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Prev by Date: Is newLISP discussed here?
- Next by Date: Re: producing a beep in common lisp
- Previous by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Index(es):