Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: JeremiaThomas@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 8 May 2007 03:15:23 -0700
On May 8, 7:19 am, Ken Tilton <k...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jon Harrop wrote:
Joe Marshall wrote:
...
What does BASIC have to do with Lisp?
It also sucks?
Well, so much for the marketing push into the fertile land of Lisp
users. Don't feel bad, I could not even sell these yobbos on a /Lisp/
library.
You don't have to sell anything good, if you have a quality product
just make it available and people will look for it by themself. Nobody
pushed me to use Celtk, Hunchentoot,CLSQL or CL-WHO I found their
quality myslef ( with some pointers, Pointers not propaganda). Now
I'm interested in Cells & cl-opengl. Good staff will stand the test of
time.
Cells is little bit ahead of it's time .For my modest needs I could go
on with pure common -lisp , but it's good to have a quality tool in
your toolbox.
jt
.
- References:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Prev by Date: Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- Next by Date: Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- Previous by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|