Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:29:57 +0200
On 8 May 2007 03:03:26 -0700, "joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see there a trend to explore mechanisms without having a
problem. Later you have a solution but not problem.
Pascal is an academic... :)
--
Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.
Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- References:
- Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Alan Crowe
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Andy Freeman
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Andy Freeman
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- From: joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- Prev by Date: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by Date: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Previous by thread: Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- Next by thread: Re: Does ANSI Common Lisp have pattern matching?
- Index(es):
