Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 20:10:51 +0100
On 2007-05-08 06:19:04 +0100, Ken Tilton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
I understand the concept (Lisp is close enough that you might pull people over) but that also means it is a great language you are trying to drag them from, so... yer gonna need a bigger tractor.
For those old enough to remember, this was pretty much the Dylan approach: pick another minority language (Lisp again) and try vigourously to attract users from it, while annoying other users. Ignore the real target audience (C++ then, Java now). Later, die.
--tim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- References:
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Prev by Date: Re: Package prefixes and symbol equality
- Next by Date: Re: NYC LOCAL: Tuesday 8 May 2007 Lisp NYC Eating and Drinking
- Previous by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Next by thread: Re: How Lisp's Nested Notation Limits The Language's Utility
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|