Re: nocaml, thanks

On May 20, 2:11 pm, Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kent M Pitman wrote:
Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Interesting that you are doing everything possible to avoid drawing a
comparison based upon code.

Interesting...

You could have put some code in there...


This is the second time (that I have seen) that you have implied that
KMP should participate in some pointless pseudo-benchmarking or
language comparison contest because he chose to respond to one of your
countless posts.

KMP has already contributed about a thousand times more useful effort,
wisdom, and insight into Common Lisp and the comp.lang.lisp newsgroup
than you could ever hope to. For you to believe that he should be
obligated to do anything to satisfy you is arrogant in the extreme. If
he wants to show us some code, he will. If he doesn't, leave him alone.

.

Relevant Pages