Re: Why I love Common Lisp : power! power! power!
- From: Mark Hoemmen <mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:34:06 -0700
jurgen_defurne wrote [cool stuff he did with CL...]:
> ...
Yay, that's a bunch of cool stuff!!! *grins*
I would like to go further and wider with the simulation, building a
more complex system. One of the possibilities that I like to
investigate is to use a variant of Lisp as a system language (yes, I
know about the history of Lisp Machines etc...). I was wondering in
this context if it wouldn't be an
advantage to implement the CLISP instruction set here, as it would
make available a complete CL implementation at once.
You may want to look at the Movitz project, which seems to have similar goals.
The other possibility is to write a GCC backend for the architecture
and take advantage of all the free/open software that is available for
C.
My personal favorite is to help port ECL to whatever system I'm using. Then, I get to use the system's native C compiler, and also write CL.
mfh
.
- References:
- Why I love Common Lisp : power! power! power!
- From: jurgen_defurne
- Why I love Common Lisp : power! power! power!
- Prev by Date: Re: n accuracy
- Next by Date: Re: Specializing slot-value-using-class in OpenMCL
- Previous by thread: Why I love Common Lisp : power! power! power!
- Next by thread: Re: Why I love Common Lisp : power! power! power!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|