Re: What would happen if...
- From: Chris Russell <christopher.m.russell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:24:40 -0000
On 10 Jun, 16:51, "JShra...@xxxxxxxxx" <JShra...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is not the goal. The goal is to make Lisp a viable competitor in
the current programming language market, dominated by C++, Java, and
Python/Ruby. The Rails part of my question is merely a part of the
overall picture. In order to play in this domain there needs to be a
single, free, excellent Lisp with a modern library and several killer
apps; Rails seems to be a killer app that would be easy to copy --
that's the only reason I mentioned Rails.
So what features do you think open source lisp is missing that
prevents it from competing efficiently, but which are present in ACL/
lispworks?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What would happen if...
- From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What would happen if...
- References:
- What would happen if...
- From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What would happen if...
- From: Tim X
- Re: What would happen if...
- From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
- What would happen if...
- Prev by Date: Re: dr Lisp
- Next by Date: Re: What would happen if...
- Previous by thread: Re: What would happen if...
- Next by thread: Re: What would happen if...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|