Re: socially challenged???!!??



Slobodan Blazeski wrote:
On Jul 3, 8:26 pm, Ken Tilton <kennytil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

jimbo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Jul 3, 10:59 am, Ken Tilton <kennytil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yeah, it was a completely ironic and deliberately self-referential post
meant to amuse and edify. How did I know it would be lost on a dolt like
you?

OK, I'll try harder in the future to keep up.

I was thinking "catch up". You come into one of the better NGs on UseNet


=>(one-of-the-better-NGs-on-UseNet-p comp.lang.lisp)
nil
-=>(best-ng-on-the-usenet-p comp.lang.lisp)
t


What part of set theory do you not understand?

hth,kt
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: socially challenged???!!??
    ... meant to amuse and edify. ... How did I know it would be lost on a dolt like ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: socially challenged???!!??
    ... meant to amuse and edify. ... How did I know it would be lost on a dolt like ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: socially challenged???!!??
    ... meant to amuse and edify. ... How did I know it would be lost on a dolt like ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: socially challenged???!!??
    ... meant to amuse and edify. ... How did I know it would be lost on a dolt like ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Issues With Rhythm
    ... newsgroups for over eight years. ... you lost your sense of decency a long time ago. ... Nil, you are by far thre biggrest time-waster on this newsgroup. ... why MikeMandible isn't in a killfile. ...
    (alt.guitar.beginner)