Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: grue@xxxxxxx (Timofei Shatrov)
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:38:39 GMT
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:22:44 -0400, Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> tried
to confuse everyone with this message:
Slobodan Blazeski wrote:
On Jul 3, 8:26 pm, Ken Tilton <kennytil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jimbo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jul 3, 10:59 am, Ken Tilton <kennytil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, it was a completely ironic and deliberately self-referential post
meant to amuse and edify. How did I know it would be lost on a dolt like
you?
OK, I'll try harder in the future to keep up.
I was thinking "catch up". You come into one of the better NGs on UseNet
=>(one-of-the-better-NGs-on-UseNet-p comp.lang.lisp)
nil
-=>(best-ng-on-the-usenet-p comp.lang.lisp)
t
What part of set theory do you not understand?
I don't understand if it's consistent or not...
--
|Don't believe this - you're not worthless ,gr---------.ru
|It's us against millions and we can't take them all... | ue il |
|But we can take them on! | @ma |
| (A Wilhelm Scream - The Rip) |______________|
.
- References:
- Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Don Geddis
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- socially challenged???!!??
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: jimbokun
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: jimbokun
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: jimbokun
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Ken Tilton
- Is Lisp a Blub?
- Prev by Date: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Next by Date: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Previous by thread: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Next by thread: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|