Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: rpw3@xxxxxxxx (Rob Warnock)
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:10:23 -0500
Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+---------------
| Yes, let the female select, they are much better at matching.
+---------------
Ah, yezz... After many years of dressing as the geek I am,
I finally developed a method of shopping for clothes that
allowed me to at least *appear* less socially challenged,
namely, take a [non-relative] female friend whose taste I
trust shopping with me: She gets to pick out stuff; I only
get to veto. This works surprisingly well.
As you say, they are much better at matching...
-Rob
-----
Rob Warnock <rpw3@xxxxxxxx>
627 26th Avenue <URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403 (650)572-2607
.
- References:
- Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Don Geddis
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Peder O. Klingenberg
- Re: socially challenged???!!??
- From: Ken Tilton
- Is Lisp a Blub?
- Prev by Date: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Next by Date: Re: Newbie question about "cons"?
- Previous by thread: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Next by thread: Re: socially challenged???!!??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|