Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:25:32 -0300
Raffael Cavallaro escreveu:
On 2007-07-11 21:50:19 -0400, jimbokun@xxxxxxxxx said:Humm. . . no!
Why not do the few remaining little things that close
the gap where other languages have a productivity edge over Lisp?
There is a market for these few remaining little things. It is being served by the commercial implementations. What you are lamenting is the fact that the free lisps do not have the ease of use of the commercial offerings, but this is only a problem for those who refuse to pay for more usable tools.
It is a (non) problem to those that make the decisions (do not) to pay for tools which in the average give the same results as the less expensive ones.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- References:
- Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Don Geddis
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: jimbokun
- Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Is Lisp a Blub?
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding why Recursion is necessary
- Next by Date: Re: cffi hell
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Lisp a Blub?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|