Re: CLOS question
- From: stamant@xxxxxxxx (Rob St. Amant)
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:01:42 -0400
Rainer Joswig <joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
* put the functionality into a different generic function m1 and
call that from just one :after method.
You can then write different primary methods for m1 and only
the most specific will be called.
This hadn't occurred to me but should do nicely in my situation, I
think. Thanks!
.
- References:
- CLOS question
- From: Rob St. Amant
- Re: CLOS question
- From: Rainer Joswig
- CLOS question
- Prev by Date: Re: CLOS question
- Next by Date: Re: CLOS question
- Previous by thread: Re: CLOS question
- Next by thread: Re: CLOS question
- Index(es):
