Re: CLOS question
- From: Scott Burson <FSet.SLB@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:48:40 -0000
On Jul 29, 3:13 pm, stam...@xxxxxxxx (Rob St. Amant) wrote:
It does seem reasonable to say, "Okay, we can get so far
with class C, but it has limited generality. Let's see what we can do
if we build D from scratch, applying what we've learned. C will end
up being a special case of D." Thanks for the thought.
You're quite welcome. It's also possible, of course, that C will turn
out not to be exactly a special case of D, in which case they'll be
siblings or cousins or something, as you originally suggested.
-- Scott
.
- References:
- CLOS question
- From: Rob St. Amant
- Re: CLOS question
- From: Scott Burson
- Re: CLOS question
- From: Rob St. Amant
- CLOS question
- Prev by Date: Re: CLOS question
- Next by Date: Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural language Minim
- Previous by thread: Re: CLOS question
- Index(es):