Re: Java connected Lisp
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:15:21 +0200
Scott Burson wrote:
Pascal Costanza, are you reading this? Back in 2002 you mentioned
that you were developing a JVM that worked (if I understand correctly)
by translating JVM bytecodes to CL and handing the result to the CL
compiler. It has long seemed to me that this would be a useful thing,
allowing Lisp and Java to call each other at function-call speed. Did
you get very far?
No, I have never finished that project due to time restrictions. The basic JIT compiler worked, but you need to do a lot more to make a JVM work.
If anyone is interested in picking this up, they can have the source code. But if I recall correctly, there is at least one other project that does a similar thing and got further than mine.
Pascal
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java connected Lisp
- From: Scott Burson
- Re: Java connected Lisp
- References:
- Java connected Lisp
- From: stoned-jonny
- Re: Java connected Lisp
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Java connected Lisp
- From: Scott Burson
- Java connected Lisp
- Prev by Date: Re: Java connected Lisp
- Next by Date: Re: error: don't know how to dump ..., &key vs &optional
- Previous by thread: Re: Java connected Lisp
- Next by thread: Re: Java connected Lisp
- Index(es):