Re: ANN: ABLE 0.4
On Aug 29, 2:59 pm, philip.armit...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
ABLE is an open source Common Lisp IDE. It runs on Linux and Windows
with either CLISP or SBCL.
I haven't had time to look at this much, and don't know that I will
soon, but I'm glad to see people doing this kind of thing. While I'm
a long-time Emacs user myself, it seems that there are a significant
number of people who would like to try Common Lisp but are not
interested in Emacs (at least, not yet); so I think it's good to
remove that barrier.
-- Scott
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: CLISP vs. CMUCL vs. SBCL
... > CMUCL: Good, fast compiler. ... What are the best points of CLISP other than portability? ... Between CMUCL and SBCL, how would one choose between these? ... > support CMUCL also seem to support SBCL, ...
(comp.lang.lisp) - Re: Bootstrapping SBCL with CLISP on OS X 10.3.1
... > build it using CLISP from Darwin Ports. ... > sure what to fix or how to fix it. ... because while SBCL makes an effort to work in ANSI lisps, ... > compile from x86 Linux to PPC OS X? ...
(comp.lang.lisp) - Bootstrapping SBCL with CLISP on OS X 10.3.1
... I have the CVS checkout of SBCL from a few hours ago. ... build it using CLISP from Darwin Ports. ... I used the 'sh make.sh clisp' command. ... I had an older version of SBCL but the upgrade to Panther broke it. ...
(comp.lang.lisp) - Re: What open source implementation of Lisp do you prefer and why?
... I use it to develop lisp programs, ... with clisp even more often). ... Slime and SBCL) and look forward to finally getting Lisp ... compiling it with sbcl gives more nitpicking errors or ...
(comp.lang.lisp) - Re: more about DEFCLASS vs DEFSTRUCT
... I have prepared a battery of tests for the implementations: sbcl, ... ;;Allegro CL 8.1 Free Express Edition ... CLISP and Allegro doesn't make any difference at all. ... (defun check-struc-let-accessor (obj times) ...
(comp.lang.lisp) |
|
