Re: Array and Hash-Table References
- From: "andrew.baine@xxxxxxxxx" <andrew.baine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:58:43 -0700
On Sep 19, 5:46 pm, are <Propon...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What are the pros and cons of a Lisp in which (AREF x 3) and (GETHASH
'c y), for example, becomes (x 3) and (y 'c), respectively? The
latter are more concise; is there a down side?
We've heard some cons, but on the pro side, functions and the data
structures you mention alike are mappings. It'd be nice to abstract
away whether that mapping is calculated by a function or stored in an
object.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Array and Hash-Table References
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Array and Hash-Table References
- References:
- Array and Hash-Table References
- From: are
- Array and Hash-Table References
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp and OCaml
- Next by Date: Re: Flamebait if I ever saw it
- Previous by thread: Re: Array and Hash-Table References
- Next by thread: Re: Array and Hash-Table References
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
