Re: [OT] Free Software Strikes Again?
- From: Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:29:04 -0400
Timofei Shatrov wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:41:08 -0300, Leandro Rios <leandroprogramador@xxxxxxxxx>
tried to confuse everyone with this message:
I am puzzled: Being the life of a man at stake, the court didn't want to wait another twenty minutes?
Probably one factor was that they had already waited twenty years and the only thing at dispute was the /method/ of execution, not the guilt or sentence. So...
Being the life of a man at stake, the lawyers couldn't get another computer to write the appeal on? A classic typewriter? By hand?
Maybe he was a really bad guy and no one really cared enough?
In Texas there is certainly that, but I wager it was more that he had strung things out for twenty years by leveraging the system's rules and as one wag noted turnabout is fair play.
kenny
--
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
"We are what we pretend to be." -Kurt Vonnegut
.
- References:
- Re: [OT] Free Software Strikes Again?
- From: Timofei Shatrov
- Re: [OT] Free Software Strikes Again?
- Prev by Date: Re: (not about) Re: How To Learn Lisp
- Next by Date: Re: Flamebait if I ever saw it
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Free Software Strikes Again?
- Next by thread: ACL:AllegroCache philosophical question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|