Re: Static, dynamic and Lisp types.

From: Jon Harrop <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:08:45 +0100

acaradesapo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Do there is a name for a language like this, that is, creating a new
name for the
same concept with different arguments?

An excellent point. This problem was already solved by Standard ML, OCaml,
F# and Haskell.

--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u
.

References:
- Static, dynamic and Lisp types.
  - From: acaradesapo

Prev by Date: Re: If VB.NET had CL macros....
Next by Date: Re: Flamebait if I ever saw it
Previous by thread: Re: Static, dynamic and Lisp types.
Next by thread: Iterating over generic sequences.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: curve for verbosity in a language
... And of the FP languages I've used, OCaml is the tersest. ... AFAIK Haskell is more powerful than OCaml in many ways but typically ... I believe that functional programming adds an extra "dimension" to factoring ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.programming)
Functional programming languages
... applications under OSX in statically-typed functional programming languages ... like OCaml, Standard ML, Haskell and F#? ... OCaml for Scientists ...
(comp.sys.mac.misc)
Re: dynamic type checking - a pauline conversion?
... The languages that have been around for at least a decade would ... include ML (Standard ML & OCaml) and Haskell. ...
(comp.object)
Re: references about the beauty of functional programming ?
... Jon Harrop wrote: ... OCaml code that's both (for Jon, at least - but Jon is not the only one ... Consortium and by developing their own dialect of Caml). ...
(comp.lang.functional)
Re: Verbose functional languages?
... means adding all of the obvious things that OCaml should have (a ... Haskell community has a very different attitude, ... things stricter than the compiler already guesses. ... Haskell has printf, but the format string is not used in type checking (it ...
(comp.lang.functional)