Re: OT Why Am I doing this?
- From: Christophe <christophe.allegrini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:27:59 -0700
On 24 oct, 19:30, Ken Tilton <kennytil...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My Algebra model sees the world as either unary or binary, so 1+2+3
cannot be (+ 1 2 3). Instead, I follow the associative thing and encode
the infix as (+ (+ 1 2) 3).
Can anyone tell me why I am encoding --42 as (- (- 42)) instead of (- (-
42)?
Extra credit: which do you think is mathematically more honest?
I'll try googling sign+associative
tia,kzo
--http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
"Career highlights? I had two. I got an intentional walk
from Sandy Koufax and I got out of a rundown against the Mets."."
- Bob Uecker
Hello,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_notation : just sentential
logical.
Best Regards.
.
- References:
- OT Why Am I doing this?
- From: Ken Tilton
- OT Why Am I doing this?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Why Am I doing this?
- Next by Date: Re: OT Why Am I doing this?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Why Am I doing this?
- Next by thread: Re: OT Why Am I doing this?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|