Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: steven.w.levine@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:01:41 -0000
What would you expect as a result? Think about it.
Well, I would expect 1229.99, wouldn't you? This is the result every
other language I've used would return. (I just checked several to
confirm -- C, Fortran, perl, R, APL). Even my free piece-of-junk
solar calculator can get the "correct" answer. If this is a floating
point nuance as you claim, and is the expected answer, then perhaps I
need to reevalulate learning lisp -- it may not be suitable for my
needs.
(sorry if this is a repeat -- original reply seemed to get lost...)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: Richard M Kreuter
- Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: Chris Russell
- Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: Bob Felts
- Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- References:
- Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: steven . w . levine
- Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- Prev by Date: Re: Learning Lisp in Linux?
- Next by Date: Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- Previous by thread: Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- Next by thread: Re: Floating point issue in sbcl 1.0.10?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|