Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: llothar <llothar@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:28:03 -0700
On 30 Okt., 07:22, George Neuner <gneuner2/@/comcast.net> wrote:
I've rarely found back traces useful other than to tell me what
function calls led to the problem. I've never seen a back trace that
included enough information to recreate the problem so I can step
through and watch.
Bad luck for you. With Eiffel 90% of the crashs with backtraces are
extremely helpfull, 80% can fix the problem immediately. This is the
benefit
of DBC and printing out the local variables not only the function
names.
The latter is indeed almost useless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- References:
- Debugging and Error Trace
- From: Arend
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: llothar
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: llothar
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- From: George Neuner
- Debugging and Error Trace
- Prev by Date: Re: how do lispers see forth?
- Next by Date: Re: Learning Lisp in Linux?
- Previous by thread: Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- Next by thread: Re: Debugging and Error Trace
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|