Re: CLOS persistence

D Herring wrote:
Ken wrote:
uh-oh. Has Lisp open software proven that Franz is worth the <gasp> price? [Cue the bolsheviks]

Devil's advocate: Or did overpriced Lisp software and hardware drive a generation of developers to cheaper (free?) alternatives such as C/C++/Perl/Python.

Whose mistake would that be?


Pascal

--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: self-managed freelist for class instances
    ... My website: http://p-cos.net ... Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org ... Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Two newbie questions about Scheme implementations
    ... My website: http://p-cos.net ... Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org ... Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: Road to Clojure Survey
    ... It's a truly innovative design. ... My website: http://p-cos.net ... Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Setting specials for the rest of a computation
    ... Thanks to all those who have responded (Jochen, Goerge, Kaz, Rainer and Marcin). ... My website: http://p-cos.net ... Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: LISP Object Oriented ?
    ... They refer to CLOS in that book. ... My website: http://p-cos.net ... Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)