Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: "Matthew D. Swank" <akopa.gmane.poster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:52:31 -0600
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:59:14 -0800, Geoff Wozniak wrote:
I have other quibbles with CLisp. One of them is that with Slime, the
argument names that show up using slime-autodoc mode are nondescript
and not helpful. I often see "arg0", "arg1", etc. I use this a lot
and it's annoying when I forget the order of arguments to things like
NTH and ELT, for example.
Even when I deploy using clisp, I almost always use something else to
develop in slime: sbcl, openmcl, even allegro on occasion (kenny will
mortified).
Matt
--
"You do not really understand something unless you
can explain it to your grandmother." -- Albert Einstein.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- References:
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Geoff Wozniak
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Prev by Date: Re: Go Forth and Lisp
- Next by Date: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Previous by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Next by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|