Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Brian Jiang <brianjcj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:59:52 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 29, 8:13 am, g...@xxxxxxx (Timofei Shatrov) wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:56:10 -0800 (PST), Javier <javu...@xxxxxxxxx> tried to
confuse everyone with this message:
What are actually the reasons to choose CLISP over other free
implementations?
The only free implementation with which you can reasonably deliver apps
on Windows. It creates small exes which can be shared with Lisp-illiterate
people. I'm using it for my roguelike games.
--
|Don't believe this - you're not worthless ,gr---------.ru
|It's us against millions and we can't take them all... | ue il |
|But we can take them on! | @ma |
| (A Wilhelm Scream - The Rip) |______________|
How to create exes in CLISP?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Johannes Groedem
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- References:
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Timofei Shatrov
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Prev by Date: Re: Getting a random hash-table element?
- Next by Date: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Previous by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Next by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|