Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations

Geoff Wozniak <geoff.wozniak@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hrm... I'll have to take a closer look at those CLOS benchmarks,
although I can't help noticing that SBCL is much faster with method
calls. My programs tend to call methods a lot more than they define
classes. As for instantiation, it seems CLisp is much slower on
simple-instantiate than SBCL. I'm curious what the benchmark code
is. (I didn't see links to code anywhere on that page.)

http://www.cliki.net/cl-bench

--
Juho Snellman
.