Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations

"js" == Juho Snellman <jsnell@xxxxxx> writes:

js> Luckily I didn't advise people on what implementations they should not
js> use. There are good reasons to use clisp. I'm just saying that the
js> benchmarks you're misinterpreting aren't such reasons.

As the perpetrator of the cl-bench collection, I can second Juho's
recommendation. Several of the microbenchmarks included in the
collection are poorly designed, and don't test what they purport to
test; some of the Gabriel benchmarks are too small to be an adequate
test of modern machines.

I've been meaning to make a new release for a long time, and may
finally get around to it soon. If anyone has some interesting
CL benchmark code that can be freely redistributed and would
complement the existing tests, please send me email.

--
Eric Marsden
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.56
    ... >> Most MM's run through all Tests like a sharp knife through cheese, ... >> but some of them didn't complete, for various reasons. ... you mentioned that all validations passed for all MMs ... a number of Benchmarks didn't work for all MMs. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
  • Re: To 6.3 or to 7.0 that is the question?
    ... any other reasons to go for that instead of 6.3? ... I just did a rather busy customer mail server this morning and so far so good. ... We havent done any benchmarks to see if its faster than the 6.x boxes, but its certainly stable so far and seems to at least keep up to the other boxes. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: SPB Benchmarks
    ... I didn't compare just final overall numbers. ... > The h19xx series scores unusually high on graphics benchmarks. ... > no one has been able to explain the reasons why. ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc)