Re: A simple debugging macro

From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:44:38 +0100

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:38:40 +0100, Frank Goenninger DG1SBG <dont-email-me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

frgo(at)mac(dot)com

BTW: frgo? That's pretty close to frog, isn't it? Frank, what are
you up to?

Edi.

--

Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.

Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.

Follow-Ups:
- OT: "frgo" is not frog! WAS: Re: A simple debugging macro
  - From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG

References:
- A simple debugging macro
  - From: fairchild.anthony@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A simple debugging macro
  - From: Ken Tilton
- Re: A simple debugging macro
  - From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG

Prev by Date: Re: A simple debugging macro
Next by Date: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
Previous by thread: Re: A simple debugging macro
Next by thread: OT: "frgo" is not frog! WAS: Re: A simple debugging macro
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Dr. Dobbs article about "Multitasking for CL"
... that makes it look as if the language hasn't changed in the last ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: Yet another when to use macros question....
... are you sure you want literal constants there? ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: Newbie: When to use let and setf in CL?
... (setf (symbol-value variable) ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: un-defclass?
... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ... Prev by Date: ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: Why Lisp supposedly "sucks for game development"
... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)