Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Rainer Joswig <joswig@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:39:34 +0100
In article <m33aung3kc.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Robert Uhl <eadmund42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rainer Joswig <joswig@xxxxxxx> writes:
Library suppoirt in linux is probably best in lisp world.
What's the word on GNOME and KDE applications in Common Lisp? Haven't
seen many...
Well, there's clg which looks nice; I've never quite gotten any work
done with it though...
Apps, not bindings. Which GNOME or KDE applications are
written in Common Lisp?
--
http://lispm.dyndns.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- References:
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Robert Uhl
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Prev by Date: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Next by Date: Re: OT: "frgo" is not frog! WAS: Re: A simple debugging macro
- Previous by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Next by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
