Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Rainer Joswig <joswig@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:08:12 +0100
In article
<08cb3bb6-1611-487d-81f9-76315fe53417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Slobodan Blazeski <slobodan.blazeski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 30, 4:39 pm, Rainer Joswig <jos...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <m33aung3kc....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Robert Uhl <eadmun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rainer Joswig <jos...@xxxxxxx> writes:
Library suppoirt in linux is probably best in lisp world.
What's the word on GNOME and KDE applications in Common Lisp? Haven't
seen many...
Well, there's clg which looks nice; I've never quite gotten any work
done with it though...
Apps, not bindings. Which GNOME or KDE applications are
written in Common Lisp?
How do you mean GNOME or KDE applications ? Allegro is written in GTK
does that qualifies for native gnome citizen?
Slobodan
Are there any other ones? Like a program that people use
and would not really notice that it is written in Lisp?
You know what I mean. A grapics app, an expert system
with GUI, a mail reader, an editor, a paint program.
Say, like Edi's Regexp tool or Clozure's Inspire Data.
But for GNOME or KDE. With the widgets and all that
stuff. Icons.
--
http://lispm.dyndns.org/
.
- References:
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Javier
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Robert Uhl
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Rainer Joswig
- Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- From: Slobodan Blazeski
- Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: "frgo" is not frog! WAS: Re: A simple debugging macro
- Next by Date: Re: Why doesn't (open ... :if-exists) support :truncate?
- Previous by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Next by thread: Re: Reasons to choose CLISP over other free implementations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|