Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:21:40 +0100
Ken Tilton wrote:
Slava Akhmechet wrote:Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Like someone just learning to play the piano who falls in love with D
minor, the saddest of all keys, and wants to play nothing else. This
we call a disease, as in to be cured.
Not a natural part of a learning process?
Non sequitor. A natural part of a learning process /is/ getting stuck in false minima, and indeed one of the biggest contributions of a coach is spotting and, um, curing these blocks.
What if the coach is wrong? Or is that blasphemy?
Pascal
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Bob Felts
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- References:
- RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Leslie P. Polzer
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Slava Akhmechet
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Slava Akhmechet
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- RFC: Extending method specializers
- Prev by Date: Re: macro that writes macros
- Next by Date: Re: (aref ary i) versus (gethash k hash) --- inconsistent?
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|