Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: wrf3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Felts)
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:57:12 -0500
Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ken Tilton wrote:
Slava Akhmechet wrote:
Ken Tilton <kennytilton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Like someone just learning to play the piano who falls in love with D
minor, the saddest of all keys, and wants to play nothing else. This
we call a disease, as in to be cured.
Not a natural part of a learning process?
Non sequitor. A natural part of a learning process /is/ getting stuck in
false minima, and indeed one of the biggest contributions of a coach is
spotting and, um, curing these blocks.
What if the coach is wrong? Or is that blasphemy?
The trick is in knowing how to know that the coach is wrong.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- References:
- RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Leslie P. Polzer
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Slava Akhmechet
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Slava Akhmechet
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- From: Pascal Costanza
- RFC: Extending method specializers
- Prev by Date: clsql hunchentoot problem working together
- Next by Date: sell Nintendo DS Lite system
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: Extending method specializers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|