Re: CLOS persistence

On Jan 4, 6:13 am, vtail <victor.kryu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Re: BDB - even after reading the "CLOS persistence" topic from
November, I still don't get what is wrong with BDB as a web-site
backend from the licensing perspective :(.

Redistribution must be accompanied by the source code of the program
using BDB, or else (where "else" is "get a commercial license").

But it's not clear whether the SaaS case is backed by the term.
With the GPL it didn't seem to suffice, hence the Affero GPL.

So either

1) gamble (with good chances since it's hard to see that a web site is
backed by BDB anyway)
2) get a commercial license
3) use another backend
.